When I type "Anti-Christ" I am not referring to the apocalyptic nemesis many expect to rise to power and ravage the planet, although, that is becoming more and more of a possibility in current events. No, what I am referring to are those that present themselves in opposition to God, the Bible, Jesus Christ, christians, and christianity, in all its forms without any provocation. Say, the topic of the bible comes up, and someone states that they do not beleive it; some might refer to such a one as an anti-christ, and, if so, I am guilty as charged, being, myself, in doubt on occassion, having differing beleifs, as is my right, as is, the right of anyone who beleives or disbeleives a truth in this land of free souls. What I am referring to are those that seek out ways of insulting religous thought and philosophy, namely, the school of christian thought. Teachers!

One instructor put a plethora of subtle, hateful enuendos about the "hegamonic", or traditional christian religion of the United States in her silybus. Another instructor, recently, gave us a quiz, of to which, she did not collect for a grade, but simply went over with us breifly in class. In it was a question : Gender roles are; A. Ordained by God; B. Socially Constructed; and C and D are unimportant. Of course, the answer was B, but she had no reason to include Biblical Scripture in the classroom other than to insult any possible christians that may be lurking in the audience. I asked a felllow student about it, and she said it was "...designed to get you thinking." What kind of sheltered soul has never been exposed to the constant bombardment that such things were not "Ordained by God"? Not many. I asked the Oppressor ... excuse me, the Proffessor about it, and she said : "Yeah... I was wondering if I was gonna' get in trouble for that..." Yeah right; once again, as Ann Coulter, puts it, another brave liberal going against the, imagined, constant fray of traditionalism. As if; everything in that classroom, from the textbooks, to the course outline is designed in opposition to the so-called "traditional" ways of thinking. But,... they're so brave...! She also meantioned something about "...this", "being really big in the 60's". Wahatever that means; now she sounds sheltered. I think she expects that I am to beleive she thinks all those churches she drives past everyday are closed or filled with people, reverently, reading psychology texbooks; or, more, accurately, that is her hope for the future. 
So, I geuss that's how they get the kids to think outside of the old onion these days; by presenting themselves as a complete anti-christ to the whole class. Good way to make people feel comfortable about accepting new ideas.

I just watched a PBS film from 2005 on "Glabal Warming". Most of the information given in this film is highly contestable. I liked the ideas about nitrogen and the C02 filters. What gets me about things like this, and what probably pushes most others away from films like this is that they progenerate this value system of responsibilty for the environment, which is very broad, and, as I said, most of which, is also, highly contestable, and, debatable, meanwhile, there is affluent science concerning the validity that a baby, or fetus, has its own blood type and heartbeat by 22 days of conception, whenever that is. And, the folks who want us to swallow the “Global Warming” phenomenon, and/or religion, beleive it's ok to terminate a life within as a matter of choice, yet the planet is bigger than all of us. They forget, easily understandable, modern, factual, science when it comes to a tiny lifeform, meanwhile, they want us to trust them with the entire planet. Lets concentrate on what we know until the scientists and proliferators of "Global Warming" are, actually, willing to discuss other possible explanations with those, including scientists, who disagree. They refuse, though. Anyone who disagrees with them is a heretic. Water and air pollution are bad, we know this. Lets find other ways to live, slowly, and gradually, as new ways of life become popular; not by giving governmental powers the right to decide who can and can't produce wealth and livlihood, which, in the extreme, has the capacity and liklihood to lead to population control through, mass beauracratic famine. Governments cant be trusted with the power they already have. Why give them more. I take the bus and walk whenever possible. I care about maintaining a natural environment, but this "Global Warming" Hysteria is a Stalinistic attempt to dominate and control capital. Also, the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) never considers, or even, remotely, investigates other possible explanations for changes in temperature; only "man made" ones that are never proven to exist. For years they have propegated different explanations which are always, eventually, debunked. They are indoctrinating people with this in schools with no, definitive, evidence. Its sickening. Factories smell and cause air and water pollution; boycott them. But dont give in to, yet another, attempt, by "Big Brother",  or, as I like to call it, 'Big Broham', to obtain more power. And, yes, I wached the entire film, as, was I, forced to watch Al Gores film at school. We need some even dialogue about this subject; Al Gore, nor any praponent of Global Warming appears to be interested in that. Because they know it is a lie, is my geuss. Why not discuss something, unless you have something to hide. Its the same reason they supress scientific research about en utero devopement, especially in abortion clinics. They want power over thought and philosophy through total control of infrmation.
Maybe, this is why Barrack O'bummer...sorry, President Obama, won't accept open questions anymore. His explanation is that he needs to know what is being discussed. One: If the President is that lost on how to answer a question, he can, always "Get back to us on that". Two: If President Bush, or any non-liberal entity practiced such Orwellian (Yes, Orwellian, I just watched "1984", and you should too) methodology they'd be catapulted into obscurity by the media; another Orwellian feature of our time. President Obama has also produced legislation that has the capacity to force small scale farming, or horticulture, a prominent theme, actually, promoted by the Left, out of business. This legislation forces them to have its small amount of customers, some just passer-bys, to fill out, yet, again, an Orwellian form stating: The Customer's Name, The Customer's Address, What the Customer bought, When the Customer Intends to Consume the Product, ect. I have no doubt this is an attempt to drive customers away from the local farming market so, that 'Big Broham' can come in like Mighty Mouse to solve the problem; which mean, buying the land from the bankrupt farmers so that the govenment controls all of the land and/or produce/production. Thes people are murderous zombies, driven by their lust for power and wealth. They are not, the care-takers of the environment thay claim to be. Small-scale farming, or horticulture, is both good and decent for the environment, and, large scale agriculture is said to be bad. So, why is President Obama initiating the demise of such, as exclaimed by the Left, a natural way of producing healthy, organic, and natural, more nutrinional, food, which would lead to better health for its consumers? Their claim is that they want to keep track of any, possible, viral strains that may be transmitted through local farming, such as eboli. Hmmm...

There have never been any such cases involving the transport of foods from a local far to a local house; because it's local. It is, nearly, the same as getting it from your own back yard, say, if you had a garden. There was another film this reminded me of. Probably George Orwell, or around the same time period. Not sure of the name, but these kids were secretly growing, forbidden flowers on a rooftop. I'll have to find that one again; it was discussed, on an aside, in my English class, where the proffessor praised Al Gore, openly, stating, with a passionate cry: "Thank you, Al Gore..!" My only hope is that he remembers the theme behind what the Instructor later told me was one if his favorite authors: George Orwell.

Read Ann Coulter's "Guilty:Liberal 'Victims' and Their Assault on America". It's so hilarious, and so right on.

Possible Solution: Ask your local farmers about a possible delivery service; perhaps you could drive for them or know of other person(s) that could. Don't let Big Brother destroy what little land has not yet been turned into, either, an industrial complex, or "protected" National Parks.

My Holistic Health teacher at the community college said "Separation of Church and State" will be enforced in the class room and on the college campus as outlined in her syllibus.
I told her that I was offended.

She said she was sorry, yet unapolagetically with a smile.

I further reiterated that it seemed very liberal.

She said : "Yeah, it's like that on purpose... It's my right as an instructor..!"
Does she have any legal right to do this, anyone ?